1997 (1) TMI 106

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) passed by Respondent No. 1 and for directing the respondents to give Modvat credit to the petitioner in respect of the items mentioned in the petition. 2. The petitioner is a Private Limited Company duly registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. In order to avail Modvat credit under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the petitioner Company filed a declaration in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tition, the Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the point projected in this petition stands concluded by the decisions in the cases of Singh Alloys Steel Ltd. v. Asstt. Collector of Central Excise - 1993 (66) E.L.T. 594 and Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Pune - 1996 (88) E.L.T. 355. He, however, concedes that the order impugned is appealable. 6. In the case of Labhchand .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellate authority the two decisions in the cases [of] Singh Alloys and Bajaj Auto (supra). There can be no manner of doubt that the appellate authority while deciding the appeal shall take into consideration these decisions. 8. In the result the petition is disposed of with the directions as under : (A) Without touching the merits of the petition the petitioner is granted liberty to fil .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X