9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (5) TMI 95X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioners. None appears for the respondents. 2.It is 1984 petition. This petition is directed against the impugned orders dated 22-8-1984, 28-9-1979 and 28-6-1979 contained in annexures 11, 8 and 7 to the petition passed by the Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 respectively. 3.The short facts leading to the petition are as under :- The petitioner M/s. Charan Metal Corporation is carrying on busin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f various items of steel furniture subject to payment of redemption fines and also imposed a penalty Rs. 50,000/- and demanded duty on the manufacture of steel furniture valued at Rs. 7,56,987.62 cleared during the period from 1-4-1973 to 10-9-1975. On an appeal by the appellants to the Central Board of Excise and Customs, the Board passed an order dated 28-9-1979 upholding the orders passed by th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rred witnesses will be recorded on particular dates, even petitioners have not made statement on oath before this Court. What was the sufficient cause which prevented petitioners to appear before the authority concerned when the statements of above referred witnesses were recorded. 6.No doubt without giving notice to the parties if the statements are used and order is passed the same vitiates th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
