2000 (10) TMI 50

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in E/ROM/553/91, E/Ref/Stay/353/91 & E/Ref/75/91-MAS in E/517/88 (Order No. 70/91), dated 25-11-1991 and quash the orders of the second respondent in E/ROM/553/91 in E/517/88 (Order No. 70/91), dated 25-11-1991 and direct the second respondent to re-dispose the application dated 17-9-1991 presented by the petitioners under Section 35C(2) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce of the Tribunal which could be seen from a reading of the Order-in-Original itself. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that there was no suppression of material facts as observed by the first respondent while dismissing the application and consequently the findings of the second respondent that the above said two letters have not been brought to the notice of the first respondent is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X