9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (2) TMI 139X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Tribunal, New Delhi (in short CEGAT), dated 11-5-2000 dealing with the application for waiver of pre-deposit for entertaining the appeal filed by the petitioner under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short, the Act) total demand raised was Rs. 20,18,685/- excluding penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs. The original order was passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi. By order dated 8-2-2000 the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2. In support of the writ petition, it has been stated that in case of similarly situated persons, matter has been remanded to the jurisdiction Commissioner of Central Excise for fresh adjudication. Learned Counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, submitted that the grounds made out now for the interference are not available to be taken and the case of the petitioner stands on an altogether ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... faulted. However, we fell that, in the interest of justice, petitioner can be granted another opportunity to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs within 4 weeks from today. If it is done and an application for restoration is filed along with proof of deposit, CEGAT shall restore the appeal and shall hear it on merits if it is otherwise free from defects. 4. Accordingly this petition is disposed of. - - Ta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
