9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (9) TMI 111X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ommissioner, Jaipur along with an application for stay before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT for short) and claimed total waiver of pre-deposit for hearing of the appeal. However, the learned Member of the Appellate Tribunal passed on order on 27-2-2002 directing the petitioner to deposit Rs. 60 lakhs as pre-deposit for hearing of the appeal. The petitioner moved ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filed relying upon the order of the Supreme Court delivered in the name of M/s. Pushpa Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs & Ors. [Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 11040/2003], decided on 8-8-2003 [2004 (165) E.L.T. A122 (S.C.)], who is petitioner in this application also, therein the petitioner had challenged the order of pre-deposit before the Tribunal and f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rther pointed out that the petitioner on account of financial crisis had not deposited this amount within the specified time granted by the High Court earlier on 29-7-2002. 2. Having heard the Counsel for the petitioner we deem it appropriate in the light of the order of the Supreme Court to grant liberty to the applicant to approach the Tribunal (CEGAT) for extension of time to deposit Rs. 35 la ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
