2005 (9) TMI 111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ocate for the petitioners. Rule. Mr. Jitendra Malkan waives service of rule on behalf of respondents. 2. All these four petitions arise out of common order dated 8-12-2004 made by respondent No. 2, the Commissioner (Appeals) in Appeal Nos. NS/11-12-13-14/Daman/2004. By the impugned order, the respondent No. 2 dismissed the appeals for non-compliance of the earlier order dated 20th September, 2004 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 638 of 2004. Thus, the delay is, in effect, of 11 days after expiry of six weeks when one takes into consideration the order made on 20th September, 2004. 4. Mr. Malkan, the learned counsel, representing the respondents, has submitted that, in the circumstances, the Court may pass appropriate order, but also consider whether the petitioners should be called upon to pay any interest for the period .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X