9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (10) TMI 153X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 25, 2006, the following order was passed by this Court :- "Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate for the respondents. It is stated on behalf of the respondents that whatever documents have been sought by the petitioners, copies thereof will be supplied, if the same have not so far been provided. On this being done, the authorities will be free t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ments seized by the department before adjudication of the matter arising out of show cause notice regarding evasion of duty. Writ petition stands adjourned for hearing with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the appropriate authorities on 28-8-2006, after recording the statement on behalf of the respondents that whatever documents were sought by the petitioners, copies thereof will be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... osed of accordingly." 3. Even though the order passed by this Court is quite explicit and in clear terms, still the petitioner has again moved an application for seeking further directions by this Court to the following extent in the procedings pending before the adjudicating authority :- "(a) All the documents prayed for by the Petitioners, including the Range records are supplied to the Petiti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the consequence of their compliance/ non-compliance is also evident therefrom. This application seems to be an attempt to either seek review of the earlier order passed by this Court or to delay the proceedings. Accordingly, finding no merit, we dismiss the application.
6. At this stage, counsels for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application. Ordered accordingly. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
