2006 (10) TMI 158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rein have on several occasions reminded the appellant requesting him to implement the impugned order. Since no action was taken, the Respondents filed WP (C) 11745-4 6/2004 in this Court in July, 2004 seeking implementation of the order dated 1-7-2003. These petitions were disposed off in favour of the Respondents by order dated August 16, 2004 passed by a Division Bench of this Court. The appella .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Registrar, CEGAT on 23-7-2004. There is, however, total inaction on the part of the appellant for almost one year, in which period the Respondents had repeatedly made representations to the appellant for implementing the impugned order. This is not a case where the appellant was not aware of the passing of the impugned order. 3. No satisfactory grounds to condone the delay are shown. The applica .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X