9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (3) TMI 206X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... E.L.T. 177 (T)] in Stay Application No. E/S/1288-1289/2008, whereby, the petitioner has been called upon to deposit a sum of Rs. 18 lacs within a period of eight weeks from the date of the order. 2. The principal grievance ventilated by learned advocate for the petitioner is that the Tribunal has committed an error in law in not following its own order dated 30-11-2006 made in the first round whe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat, in the alternative, the total demand relatable to the three items in relation to which the Tribunal has called upon the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 18 lacs, the total amount of duty involved is Rs. 19 lacs and odd and thus, it virtually amounts to directing deposit of 100% duty amount. 3. After hearing the learned counsel and going through the impugned order, the Court does not find i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the impugned order is not a reasoned order. At this stage the Court is not required to examine the merits or demerits of the case of either side. Therefore, without entering into the merits of the matter, the Court does not find this to be a fit case to intervene. 4. The impugned order of Tribunal is dated 18-12-2008 and the petitioner was called upon to report compliance by 17-2-2009, which has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
