9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (1) TMI 154X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Meerut-II passed on the application under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act (hereinafter referred to as "Act"). Petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of various excisable goods namely, Portable Gen sets, IC Engines, P.D. Pump sets and parts thereof falling under Chapter Heading Nos. 85.02, 84.08, 84.13 and 84.13 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Petitioner has re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... duty amounting to Rs. 20,61,226/- within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order. Heard Sri Madhav Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Philips India Limited v CCE, Pune, reported in 19 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e has been made out by the petitioner. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Commissioner (Appeals) is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner expeditiously within a period of two months from the date of filing of the certified coy of the order, which the petitioner undertakes to file within a period of ten days, without asking for deposit of any amount of duty. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
