2000 (10) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s) whereby the benefit of modvat credit was denied to the appellants. 2. Ld. Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellants, submits that in this case show cause notice was issued to the appellants for denying the benefit of modvat credit in terms of Rule 57H(1)(b) of Central Excise Rules on the ground that the assessee has not explained as to how much quantity of inputs, for which the claim was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... had not furnished full particulars while seeking permission in terms of Rule 57H(1)(b) of Central Excise Rules. The relevant portion of the show cause notice is reproduced below : "Moreover, the party have not furnished the information in terms of Rule 57-H(1)(b) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 to the satisfaction of the Assistant Collector as to how much quantity of inputs, for which the claim w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... do not contain the particulars, such as, rate of duty, etc. required under Notification 15/94. The Commissioner (Appeals) also held that no declaration, under Rule 57G of Central Excise Rules, was filed. 6. In the show cause notice, there is no allegation for denying the benefit of Modvat credit on the ground that no declaration was filed. The show cause notice was issued on the basis of necess .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X