2001 (2) TMI 180

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r orders, we heard the ld. Counsel representing the appellants and the ld. DR in detail. After perusing the records, we are disposing of the appeal itself without passing any separate order on stay petitions. 2. The appellants manufactures ayurvedic medicines. In respect of three products namely 'Panchphool Tel, 'Ghrit Kumari Tel' and 'Himani Kalyan Tel' stated to be patent ayurvedic medicines, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unsel representing the appellants, a duty demand could have been made by the competent authority only pursuant to show cause notice. No show cause notice was issued demanding the duty and according to Counsel, no opportunity was afforded to the manufacturer to submit his defence to the demand made by the Superintendent in the letter dated 12-8-1997. Ld. Departmental Representative reiterated the c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X