2003 (7) TMI 142

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m the appellant on the ground that its Advocate, Mr. V.G. Kumar, is out of station. He is unable to explain as to why he could not be present. He says that he was merely told by Mr. Kumar to take an adjournment. I am afraid, that it is not possible for me to adjourn in response to such a casual request without being satisfied as to the genuineness of it. 2. Having communicated to this decision to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this appeal. 4. I do not find it possible to accept the contention that the Commissioner (Appeals) has passed a non-speaking order. He has relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Astra Pharmaceuticals v. CCE - 1995 (75) E.L.T. 214 to say that the house mark of a manufacturer cannot be a brand name or trade name is specified in Note 5 to Chapter 30 of the Tariff. The appellant did not enc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X