2003 (4) TMI 178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tribunal. Shri K.P. Dey, learned Advocate, for the applicant/appellant submits that though the impugned Order was sent to the applicant/appellant by registered post and was received by him, the appeal was not filed by the applicant/appellant on the understanding that as the main appellant i.e. owner of the betel-nuts, has filed the appeal, there is no need for him to file a separate appeal against .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... his truck. The delay of 454 days cannot be condoned on this ground. The applicant's/appellant's reliance upon the West Regional Bench decision is not appropriate inasmuch as in that case, the delay of four years in filing the supplementary appeals (emphasis provided) was condoned on the ground that the main appeal was filed in time. The present appeal filed by the appellant herein, is not a supple .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X