2003 (7) TMI 165

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y the Commissioner (Appeals) after allowing the refund claim adjusted the amount against the pending dues. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The contention of the appellants is that the adjustment was made without any notice to the appellants. The appellants relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Kutty Flush Doors Furniture Co. (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, reported in 1989 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as dummy of M/s. Kinetone, therefore, clubbed the clearance of M/s. Cinelamp and M/s. International Talkie Equipment Co. Pvt. Ltd., hence, the adjustment of refund against the excise dues is right. 6. In this case the refund of pre-deposit was allowed by the Revenue authorities and the same was adjusted against the excise dues. Before adjusting the amount of the appellants was not to put notice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X