TMI Blog2003 (7) TMI 207X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Assistant Collector decided these two notices vide his order dated 1-2-1990 dropping the proceedings initiated and permitting the deductions as claimed. On 1-2-90 department filed an appeal and vide order dated 25-11-91, the Collector (Appeals) remanded the matter for de novo determination of the values in line with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ujagar Prints. In the de novo proceedings order dated 5-8-92, was issued by the Assistant Commissioner directing the appellants to file a price-list based on cost of raw-material. Job work charges, manufacturing expenses as required by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ujagar Prints. In the mean time, price-lists for the period 1-4-88 to 31-3-89 were approved on the b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r Copy to the Superintendent of Central Excise SRP-1 Range -You are directed to undertake provisional assessments of the R.T. 12s pertaining to the period in question i.e. from October, 1990 and direct the assessee to file revised price lists within 10 days of receipt of this letter. Sd/- (N.K.P. Prasada) Assistant Collector" 2. The appellants filed revised documents. However, they were issued another notice dated 7-2-97 by the Assistant Commissioner holding that on finalisation of the provisional assessment for the valuation of biscuits for the period April, 96 to March, 98 there was a differential duty of Rs. 1,01,01,940/- which was demanded without giving any opportunity to the appellants about the finalis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Samrat International Ltd. [1992 (58) E.L.T. 561 (S.C.)] and of the Larger Bench in the case of Rajiv Mardia [2001 (129) E.L.T. (334)] and held that the assessments in this case cannot be considered as final and therefore, duties as demanded were required to be paid and upheld the order of the Assistant Commissioner. Hence, this appeal. 5. After hearing both sides and considering the material on record, it is found - (a) The short-point that arises in this case is whether the assessments during the subject period were provisional or final and if they were not provisional, the demands could not have been effected. It is found that the Apex Court in the case of Metal Forgings Anr. [2002 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch provisional classification. In the absence of the same, we cannot accept the argument of the revenue that in fact the order of the Assistant Collector dated 21-1-1976 is a provisional order based on which clearance was made by the appellants or that they paid duty on that basis. On the contrary, as held by the Judicial Member the said order of classification was a final order, therefore, the Revenue cannot contend the limitation prescribed under Section 11A does not apply." Applying the tests of the Hon'ble Apex Courts, as laid down in Para 14, extracted herein above, it is essential to find out in this case whether there was an order under Rule 9B and whether, there was a provisional approval of price-lists in this case. The learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... enue, cannot be construed as an order on which the goods were to be cleared on provisional basis. Since, the provisional clearances effected as per this order, would be only prospective and not covered the clearance prior to the date of issue of the said order. The endorsement in the said order dated 5-2-93 is to keep the RT-12 assessments for the month of October, 90 to be made as provisional would be for goods already cleared and not to be cleared. It is therefore not considered to be an order under Rule 9B. The Revenue has also not enclosed any copy of a Bond, to be executed, as required under the provisions of the said Rule 9B, which would have been executed by the assessee and was a requirement under the said Rule. The price lists for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|