2004 (9) TMI 254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No. C-IV/1224/WZB/2004, dated 4-3-2004 in Appeal No. E/521/2001. In the impugned order the ld. Member (T) sitting single rejected the appeal despite the claim of the appellants that in some other appeals involving similar issues the Tribunal has passed orders accepting their submissions. 2. Briefly the facts are that the appellants use duty paid inputs in the manufacture of two kinds of finished .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... filed an appeal before CESTAT. In the impugned order the Tribunal rejected the appeal. 3. This ROM is filed on the basis of a subsequent order of the same Member (T) sitting single in his final order A-233-237 C-IV/WZB/2004, dated 29-4-2004 [2004 (176) E.L.T. 291 (Tri.)] held that the decision cited supra (impugned order) was passed on a wrong appreciation of facts. The applicant argued that in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X