2005 (1) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appeal against the OIA No. 62/2004-C.E., dated 31-5-2004 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad. 2. The Respondents cleared goods falling under Chapter 87 to M/s. BEML by availing exemption under Notification 63/95-C.E. without payment of duty. Therefore, they paid 8% of the value of goods under CENVAT Rule No. 6. M/s. BEML reimbursed the amount of 8% to the respondent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ctly debited 8% of the sale value of the exempted goods supplied to M/s. BEML. This amount is not considered as duty. There is no law, which says that they should not collect this amount of 8% from the buyer of the goods. Section 11D of the CE Act, 1944 will be attracted only when duty is collected and not paid to the exchequer. When the amount collected is not duty, Section 11D will not come into .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X