Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (9) TMI 181

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In these circumstances, we allow the appeals with consequential relief.
HON'BLE S.L. PEERAN, MEMBER (J) AND SHRI T.K. JAYARAMAN, MEMBER (T) For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : K.S. Bhatt, SDR Order T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) 1. The details of the six appeals filed against Orders-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Bangalore are as follows. Sl. No. Appeal No. Name of the Party Order-in-Appeal 1. No. 386/03 Segu Mohammed Hanas v. CC, Cochin No. 62/2003 2. No. 387/2003 Shri Puthenmannath John Joy v. CC, Cochin No. 64/2003 3. No. 388/2003 Ms. Sunitha Baburajan v. CC, Cochin No. 105/2003 4. No. 389/2003 K. Gafoor Koya v. CC, Cochin No. 104/2003 5. No. 390/2003 Shri Qamruddin v. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing arguments. (i) In all these cases, there was no invoice for import into India. The only invoice was that issued at the time of purchase of the car in the country of use. The basis adopted for discarding the declared value are determining the assessable value is contrary to the section 14(1) of the Customs Act 1962 read with Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. In all these cases, the appellants had produced the manufacturers' certificate regarding the price of the car with various fittings. This has not been challenged. The values have been arrived at so called list price, which was not an export price and that too for export into India. The list price includes various local levies, which cannot be taken into account for determining the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... several decisions of the Tribunal but also have been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of M/s. Gajra Bevel Gears v. Commissioner of Customs - 2000 (115) E.L.T. 612 (S.C.). (v) The Supreme Court in the matter of Tolin Rubbers Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs reported in 2004 (163) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.) following its earlier decision in the matter of Eicher Tractors Ltd. has held in unequivocal terms that in respect of second-hand goods Rule 8 is not applicable. (vi) The Circuit Bench at Cochin in the matter of Bala Krishna Pillai v. Commissioner of Customs, reported in 2003 (156) E.L.T. 414 (T) has held that sales need not be at list prices. A long standing practice is no ground to adopt a method of valuation contrary .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates