Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1981 (9) TMI 157

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... J. Kasli at Navsari. Barring a few payments in draft or cheque, the rest of the payments made for the purchases were in cash. The ITO was of the opinion that these payments would be hit by section 40A(3). He added Rs. 1,79,787 on this account. 2. The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted the addition. According to him, the assessee's purchases would be saved from the provisions of section 40A(3) by virtue of rule 6DD. This rule exempts payments in cash from the purview of section 40A(3) if the payments were made for the purpose of fish or fish products and other allied items. The Commissioner (Appeals) was of opinion that frog legs dealt with by the assessee could be broadly considered as covered by the expression 'fish or fish products'. He de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... should be used in interpreting the provisions of rule 6DD. He submitted that the department should not be allowed to raise the question whether the two parties concerned were producers of frog legs or not. 6. We have considered the facts of the case. It is an admitted position that payments have been made exceeding Rs. 2,500 otherwise than by a crossed cheque and, therefore, the provisions of section 40A(3) would apply ; but shelter is taken under rule 6DD. This rule states as follows : "6DD. No disallowance under sub-section (3) of section 40A shall be made where any payment in a sum exceeding two thousand five hundred rupees is made otherwise than by a crossed cheque drawn on a bank or by a crossed bank draft in the cases and circums .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... than cereals, i.e., rice, wheat, etc., which are coming under clause (1), or mutton, eggs, chicken, etc., which would come under clause (ii). So, the term 'fish or fish products' denotes a genus and all items, which are allied to fish and which are edible, will have to be considered under this head. Thus, prawn, shrimps, lobsters, etc., which are definitely not fish, will have to be considered as fish or fish products for this purpose. If prawns, shrimps, etc., should be considered as fish for this purpose, we see no reason why it should not be extended to frog legs also. 9. We have also been shown extracts from the Import Trade Control Policy which has a heading of fish and fish products. The details of this show that under this head wo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates