Home Highlights June 2013 Year 2013 This

You may also like:

1. Stay of demand - AO directed to pay 20% of demand for stay which was not complied - Ld. single Judge put precondition to 10% deposit to consider stay petition by CIT(A)...

2. Remand of the matter - the approach of the Tribunal is to abdicate its duty of deciding the matter on the merits or to retain the matter till the outcome of the pending...

3. The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the...

4. Dismissal of appeal for non compliance of stay order - The stay applications of individual appellants, having regard to their peculiar circumstances, should be...

5. Appeal against the stay order - non compliance of stay order - Instead of 60%, appellant directed to pre-deposit 4 crores within 6 weeks. - HC

6. The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

7. Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

8. National Financial Reporting Authority Amendment Rules, 2022 - Punishment in case of non-compliance - Notification

9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

10. Scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Non compliance of assessee v/s Non compliance of AO - Can assessee take advantage of his own non compliance -...

11. Non-compliance of pre-deposit order - dismissing the appeal for non compliance of the predeposit order cannot be faulted - HC

12. Set off of refund against oustanding demand u/s 245 - non receipt of notice u/s 245 - stay of demand was granted by the ITAT - It is difficult to appreciate the stand of...

13. Non-compliance with the orders of High Court - direction to extend the AAD as mentioned in Notification No. 39/2018 Custom (ADD) - nothing prevented the respondents from...

14. Tribunal not deciding the matter itself and remanding it to the Assessing Officer - it is noticed that the approach of the Tribunal is to abdicate its duty of deciding...

15. Stay of demand - payment of 20% of the outstanding demand - ITAT rejecting its application for stay on the recovery of demand during the pendency of appeal - The Delhi...