Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10(38) where no ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 12, 2013

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10(38) where no STT was paid - the assessee having not disclosed fully and truly all the material facts relevant to the said claim liable for penalty u/s 271(1)(c). - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10(38) where no ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 12, 2013

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had claimed it as exempt u/s 10(38) as it suffered STT but subsequently withdrew the claim - at the most it...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrendered undisclosed income during the search and seizure - assessee contented that income disclosed in the return U/s 139(1) though claimed...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Denial of exemption of capital gains u/s 10(38) on account of sale of shares - The Tribunal also emphasized that the Revenue had failed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - it is a clear case of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee when the assessee has claimed the long term capital gain exempt...

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) - claim of exemption u/s 10(38) whereas sale of shares was not through stock exchange - company adopted LIFO method where as AO adopted FIFO...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility...

Bogus LTCG - genuineness of transaction not proved - exemption u/s 10(38) - assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of...

Quick Updates: