Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2013 Year 2013 This

Clandestine removal of goods - 100% EOU - date of Debonding - ...


Court Examines Evidence Quality in EOU Goods Removal Case; Focus on Debonding Date Crucial for Assessment.

September 24, 2013

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal of goods - 100% EOU - date of Debonding - the case has to be seen not having regard to how many pieces of evidences are there but with reference to quality of the evidence available. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  2. Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported...

  3. 100% EOU - whether the benefit of Central Excise (Removal of goods at concessional rate of duty for manufacture of Excisable goods) Rules, 2001 is available to 100% EOU...

  4. CESTAT ruled that sale of capital goods within a 100% EOU to an overseas buyer without physical removal does not constitute deemed debonding requiring customs duty...

  5. The High Court examined the validity of the summoning order and framing of notice u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, in a dishonor of cheque case. It...

  6. Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

  7. The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

  8. Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

  9. Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of...

  10. In a case involving dishonour of a cheque due to variance in signature, the petitioner failed to cross-examine the respondent, leading to invocation of Section 391 of Cr....

  11. Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

  12. The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

  13. Undervaluation of goods - The goods were examined, assessed and cleared by Customs and were no longer available for re-examination. It is trite to say that if the...

  14. HC examined validity of detention and seizure notice under GST Act Section 129(3). Referring to government circular dated 31-12-2018 defining ownership of goods through...

  15. This case deals with the issue of granting bail in a case involving forgery, creation of fake GST firms, and related economic offenses. The key points are: The court...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates