Benefit of Notification No. 108/95 - nly objection raised by the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

October 28, 2013

Benefit of Notification No. 108/95 - nly objection raised by the Revenue is that certificate was not in the name of present respondents - the certificate is to be in respect of the goods that the same are required for the project - No demand - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefit of Notification No. 108/95 - nly objection raised by the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

October 28, 2013

You may also like:

Benefit of Exemption - Supply of goods to the contractor or subcontractor of PIA - UN/International Organisations or Projects - N/N. 108/95-CE - It is not in dispute...

Benefit of exemption Notification No. 108/95-C.E. - while an exemption certificate has been produced, the same mentions the contractor’s name as “M/s. K. Rama Krishna,...

Exemption Notification No.108/95-CE dated 28.08.1995 - goods not supplied directly to UNICEF but were supplied to project assisted and Financed by UNICEF - benefit of...

Benefit of Notification No.108/95 C.E. - projected funded by the UN - Machines were utilized by the job worker in respect of the project - exemption allowed - HC

Denial the benefit of the exemption notification no. 45/2017-Cus and 46/2017-Cus - Re-importation of the goods - The appellant exported goods to Thailand but faced...

Appellant availed exemption under Sr. No. 108(1) of Notification No. 23/98-Cus, which unconditionally exempts goods without requiring an end-use certificate. Department...

Benefit of Exemption N/N. 108/95-CE - Merely, on the ground that the goods have been supplied to the contractor directly who has executed the project in question and...

Rejection of the refund claim - Notification No. 108/95-CE - Benefit of exemption notification should be extended if eligible irrespective of the stage at which the...

Eligibility for Duty Exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E – Assesse cannot be accorded of suppressing the relevant facts from the Department, more so, when the...

Benefit of Notification No.108/95 - Project funded by the World Bank and Asian Development Bank – As the machineries had been put in use by the sub-contractors, who were...

Benefit of Notification No.108/95-CE dt. 28.8.1995 - Demand can be confirmed only based on a specific finding that the goods were removed outside the project and not...

The appellant had initially exported Indian tea to Netherlands, which was rejected and recalled to India. Upon re-importation, no DEPB claim was advanced. The goods were...

Benefit of Notification No. 67/95-C.E. - capital goods - The burden to prove that the impugned items fall under the scope of exemption notification is squarely on the assessee - AT

The Appellate Tribunal examined the objections raised by the Personal Guarantors regarding the violation of principles of natural justice and the locus standi of the...

Benefit of Nil Rate of duty - MS Pipes - Notification No.6/2002 - The Tribunal observed that the appellant failed to produce certificates from the District Collector for...

Quick Updates: