Tribunal while deleting the penalty has made a passing ...

Case Laws Central Excise

February 12, 2014

Tribunal while deleting the penalty has made a passing observation to the effect that there was no intention to evade payment of duty. - This, however, does not in any way nullify or negate the principal finding - demand confirmed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal while deleting the penalty has made a passing ...

Case Laws Central Excise

February 12, 2014

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty under Section 54(1) (14) of UP VAT Act - The Tribunal has only observed that non-filing of various columns in Form 38 indicates that there was...

Levy of penalty - Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - wrong E-way bill - in penal provision such as Section 129 of the GST Act, the element of intention to evade tax...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Addition u/s 68 - disclosure made by the assessee on the basis of documents impounded during the course of survey proceedings - The Tribunal deleted the addition holding...

100% EOU - Confirmation of demand and levy of penalty - The Tribunal was right in stating that the intention of the assessee was not as that of an honest tax payer as...

Assessment against an entity that had ceased to exist prior to the initiation of proceedings. The effect of a change in name was considered a curable defect u/s 292B, as...

TP Adjustment - TPO rejected the TP study undertaken by the assessee and proceeded to apply TNMM at the entity level which the assessee company has objected to - CIT(A)...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1) (14) of the U.P. VAT Act - The court held that in the absence of a cogent finding of an intention to evade tax, the levy of penalty under...

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - penalty order, was passed beyond the time period prescribed by Section 275(1)(c) - the same...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

Quick Updates: