Penalty u/s 271D - The ambit of the Section 269SS is clearly ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 3, 2014

Penalty u/s 271D - The ambit of the Section 269SS is clearly restricted to transaction involving acceptance of money and not intended to affect cases where a debt or a liability arises on account of book entries - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D - The ambit of the Section 269SS is clearly ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 3, 2014

You may also like:

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Penalty u/s 271D - Acceptance of loan in Cash by the appellant firm from its agriculturist customer - violation of provisions of section 269SS - penalty confirmed - HC

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Penalty u/s 271D and penalty u/s 271E - Assessee for taking loan in cash and repaying the loan in cash - the moneys in question were received and repaid for personal...

Penalty u/s 271D - accepting loan in cash - reasonable cause - the AO has neither doubted the impugned transaction nor any addition made in this behalf even under...

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

Penalty u/s 271D - accepting cash loan of Rs. 2 lakh in aggregate without any reasonable cause in contravention to section 269SS - transactions between father and son,...

Levying penalty u/s 271D - violation of section 269SS - “reasonable cause” u/s 273B - sale of property - total consideration assessee received part by demand draft and...

Penalty made u/s 271D - loan transaction between husband and wife - while levying the penalty u/s. 271D AO did not appreciate the fact that the provisions of section...

Levy of penalty u/s 271D - transaction between husband and wife - transaction of loan between husband and wife does not attract the provisions of section 269SS - Penalty...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Quick Updates: