Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Claim of depreciation on leased ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 16, 2014

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Claim of depreciation on leased assets - The transactions entered into by the assessee were sham and bogus transactions which were intended to defeat the provisions of law - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Claim of depreciation on leased ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 16, 2014

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Claim of depreciation on financed leased assets - AO while disallowing the claim of depreciation has not considered the exclusion of the...

Claim of depreciation in respect of assets allegedly leased - financing transactions - assessee purchased assets and leased back to the same company claiming 100% depreciation - HC

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claiming false depreciation - lease transaction not to be a bonafide transaction - three authorities have concurrently held on facts...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Suo-moto declaration of undisclosed assets located outside India under section 59 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation as assets were not put to use for the purpose of running business activity in the years under consideration...

Whether entering into a lease transaction would amount to transfer? - the CIT(A) is right in its observation that a lease transaction would not amount to a transfer and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Quick Updates: