Levy of penalty u/s 271D – it is not legally correct to contend ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 1, 2014

Levy of penalty u/s 271D – it is not legally correct to contend that the assessee and its members are one and the same person and the transactions with the members are outside the scope of s. 269SS - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271D – it is not legally correct to contend ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 1, 2014

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Penalty levied u/s 271D - assessee has availed cash loan in contravention of provision of section 269SS - Assessee has submitted that though the assessee has initially...

Lesser penalties for One Person Companies or small companies - lesser penalties (not be more than one-half) for one person companies and small companies - Section 446B...

Addition u/s 69A - Source of Cash deposit - Assessee contended that same is received in advance against the sale of property - Levy of penalty u/s 271D - The ITAT held...

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Levy of penalty under Section 271D - Whether the Tribunal is correct in concluding that the provisions of Section 269SS of the Act were attracted to the transactions...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Penalty levied u/s. 271D r.w.s. 273B - reasonable cause for the assessee to accept loan over ₹ 20,000/- in cash - levy of penalty confirmed.

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Benefit of Amnesty Scheme - Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - When a specified sum is so provided as the penalty, such specified sum is the minimum penalty payable....

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

Levy of penalty u/s 271D - Receipt of deposits in cash in contravention of provisions of section 269SS - The assessee explained before the authorities below that two of...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Quick Updates: