Rule 8(3A) is ultra vires of Article 14 on the ground of ...

Case Laws Central Excise

May 19, 2015

Rule 8(3A) is ultra vires of Article 14 on the ground of arbitrariness. - all the proceedings initiated by the Department in respect of the respective assessees, invoking the said rule by demanding duty along with interest by denying the benefit of CENVAT credit have to be necessarily set aside - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rule 8(3A) is ultra vires of Article 14 on the ground of ...

Case Laws Central Excise

May 19, 2015

You may also like:

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

CENVAT Credit - restrictions in using the cenvat credit for payment of duty for the clearances - Pursuant to quashing of Rule 8(3A) by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court,...

Constitutional Validity - West Bengal Excise (Change in Management) Rules, 2009 - Changes in the Board of Directors - The inevitable conclusion must be that clause (d)...

SERVICE TAX ON REIMBURSEMENTS IS ULTRA VIRES - Article

The interest is evidently and explicitly payable under Rule 6(3A) clause (e) read with Rule 14 of CCR 2004. The interest has indeed been demanded under Rule 14 of CCR...

Constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of the 2002 Rules - the unamended Rule 8(3A) of 2002 Rules whereby the benefit of CENVAT Credit for all the period till the actual...

Constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules 2002 - Condition contained in sub-rule (3A) of rule 8 for payment of duty without utilizing the cenvat...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

MEIS scheme - conversion of the EPCG shipping bill into the EPCG cum Drawback shipping bill - Since in the present case, the amendment of shipping bills by converting...

Imposition of Penalty - violation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 are clearly proved. Provisions Rule 8(3A) are self-contained requiring penal actions....

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

The petitioner sought release of an export subsidy of Rs. 8,08,50,000/-. The respondent confirmed that the milk powder exported by the petitioner, amounting to 1617...

Conduct of lotteries - Power of Host State to make rules under section 12 of the Act to monitor the conduct of lotteries of Organising States within the territory of the...

Petitioner seeking declaration that rule 11B(2)(c) of Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules,1957 as invalid and ultra vires being in consistent with Central Sales Tax...

Quick Updates: