When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to ...

Case Laws Service Tax

May 26, 2015

When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to December, 2006 is a meagre ₹ 19,576/- the demand for a mere 3 months will be pittance or less making it ridiculous to remand the case for computation thereof - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to ...

Case Laws Service Tax

May 26, 2015

You may also like:

The appellant supplied gear boxes to Mega Power Projects and availed exemption benefit under Notification No. 06/2006-C.E. dated 01.03.2006. The adjudicating authority...

In assessment year 2002-03 the total contribution to the pension fund during the year was ₹ 1.22 crores out of which ₹ 22,89,137/- were actually disbursed to...

Requirement of pre-deposit - Direction to deposit 75% of the awarded amount in terms of Section 19 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 -...

Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

Refund of CENVAT credit accumulated - the claim which was returned for the period from October 2006 to December 2006 cannot be held as resubmitted where the part of the...

Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It cannot be gainsaid that the Respondent/Financial Creditor, after considering the proposal of the Appellant for ‘One Time...

Demand of service tax - brokerage received on IPO related service - Business Auxiliary Services - appellant’s activity is neither covered u/s 65(19)(i) as they are not...

Whether the re-assessment proceedings initiated against the petitioner are barred by limitation? - The amendment made to Section 40 of the Act, cannot be construed so as...

Demand under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) 65(19) without specifying which specific sub-clause covers the activities, demand is not sustainable

Small Scale exemption - determination of turnover upto ₹ 4 crores of previous financial year - There was no justification in including the value of clearance...

Amends Notification No. 21/2002-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2002 - Ntf. No. 120 /2011 Dated: December 30, 2011

Amends Notification No. 20/2006-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2006 - Ntf. No. 118/ 2011 Dated: December 29, 2011

Rescinds notification no. 78/2006-Customs, dated the 8th August, 2006 - Ntf. No. 108/2011 Dated: December 5, 2011

No over the counter exchange of old ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 notes after midnight of 24.11.2016;.Certain other exemptions continued till 15th December, 2016 with...

Reversal of input tax credit (ITC) - A plain reading of the section 19(2)(v) as it stood during the period in dispute and thereafter shows that it applies only to the...

Quick Updates: