Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee made a claim on the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2015

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee made a claim on the bona fide belief that the subject land was an agricultural land, merely because the same was rejected, that cannot be a reason to levy penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee made a claim on the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Gain on sale of land - Bona-fine belief that the land under consideration was an agricultural land only - No mala-fide intention could be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

Quick Updates: