Denial of refund claim - Just because the prices were not ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 24, 2015

Denial of refund claim - Just because the prices were not finalized by the respondents' customers within 3 to 4 months, the assessment cannot be treated as provisional, and, therefore, the limitation period prescribed under section 11B would be applicable for filing of the refund claim - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - Just because the prices were not ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 24, 2015

You may also like:

Entitlement for interest on refund - finalizing the assessment after delay of 8 years - The appellant is entitled to interest if the refund is payable after the expiry...

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate...

Refund claim - Bar of limitation - Respondent filed refund claim consequential to the dropping of demand under adjudication order dated 27/11/2009 within 3 months -...

Assessment u/s 153C versus 143 - Additions u/s 45 - Underreporting of sale consideration for immovable property while framing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) - Whether...

Refund claim - order of assessment in appeal not challenged - The Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' arguments regarding the contractual agreement and the price...

Refund claim u/s 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1994 was partially allowed. Refund of Rs. 20,52,143/- and Rs. 2,19,004/- granted,...

The High Court held that the delay in issuing the tax refund was subject to the strict limitation period prescribed u/s 254 read with Section 153(3). The Assessing...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

The case involved a dispute over the refund of a cash security deposit u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal held that the rejection of the refund on...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction - objections were raised by the assessee u/s 124(3) of the Act, within one month of receipt of notice u/s 148 of the Act...

Duty Free Shops (DFS) at airports and various government authorities - Refund of amount collected by respondents No.3 and 4 (AAI) on wrongful application of CGST Act,...

Assessment of turnover of the applicant as per Section 4(3) of the VAT - levy of tax on turnover of sale has to be done in the manner provided in Section 4(3) of the Act...

Refund claim - reduction of price subsequent to clearance of the goods - Refund claim rejected - price variation clause itself is not a ground to consider the assessment...

Quick Updates: