Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2015 Year 2015 This

Rejection of permission to remove the goods for further ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

November 2, 2015

Rejection of permission to remove the goods for further processing under Rule 16C of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - permission under Rule 16C is not legally sustainable. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refusal to grant of permission to remove the goods for further processing under Rule 16C of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - The order does not mention any specific...

  2. Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

  3. Warehousing - Rejection of request for permission under Rule 4(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 to store excisable goods out side the factory premises without payment of...

  4. Revocation of Central Excise Registration - very person, who produces or manufactures any excisable goods, shall get registered. Thus, without registration, the...

  5. Rebate of duty on exports - Compound duty on Pan Masala Packing - Rule 14 - the stand of the department that no rebate can be allowed under Rule 14 of the Central Excise...

  6. Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

  7. Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

  8. Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

  9. Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - In case of breakage/destruction of final product, remission can be claimed under Rule 21 of Central...

  10. Rule 11 of the central Excise Rules read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 - TThe reason that the goods were not available to confiscation should not be a...

  11. Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

  12. Valuation of goods sold at the depots - the absence of a transaction value from the depot would bring the impugned goods within the ambit of section 4 (1)(b) of Central...

  13. Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

  14. Penatly - default in payment of duty - provisions of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - penalty under Rule 27 only can be imposed - no penalty under Rule 25...

  15. Cenvat Credit denied on the ground that invoices did not contain necessary details as required under Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - The fact that Rule 9(2) is...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates