Duty demand - discrepancy in relation to recording of e-Challans ...

Case Laws Central Excise

November 6, 2015

Duty demand - discrepancy in relation to recording of e-Challans in the ER-1 return - Considering the proof of payment of e-receipts, which is on record and the same can be verified from the system ACES data base by the adjudicating authority, confirming the demand only on the basis of ER-1 entry is not justified - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Duty demand - discrepancy in relation to recording of e-Challans ...

Case Laws Central Excise

November 6, 2015

You may also like:

Central Excise Return New Form ER 1 for monthly return and ER 3 for quarterly return w.e.f 1.10.2011

Demand - duty on difference between finished goods reported in their 3CD returns and the RG-1 daily stock account - less quantity of clearance has been shown in their...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Levy of penalty under Rule 12 (6) of Central Excise Rules - late filing of Returns (ER-1) for the period July, 2017 to February, 2018 - There is no saving Clause in the...

Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

Entitlement for refund of input credit in cash, which was neither transitioned in accordance with TRAN-1 (GST) procedure into the new regime nor got reflected in the...

Demand of duty - When assessee duly filed ER-1 returns, the jurisdictional Range Officer is required to carryout scrutiny of the returns. If this had been done, the...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section...

Non considering the revised return filed by the assessee for rectifying the mistake in claim of depreciation - In this case, the original return was not filed under...

Late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) - Contribution made prior to filing of the return of income u/s. 139(1) - Addition by way of adjustment while...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Demand of duty (CVD & SAD) foregone at the time of import - The quantity of imported Sulphur, which was not used in manufacture of fertilizer - the said clearances of...

Quick Updates: