Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - Unable to understand that how the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

May 23, 2016

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - Unable to understand that how the collected amount, which was required to be deposited, can lead to any financial hardship on the part of the assessee inasmuch as it was collected amount only which was required to be deposited - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - Unable to understand that how the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

May 23, 2016

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

Declared Service or not - appellant had collected an amount towards compensation/penalty from the buyers of coal on the short lifted/un-lifted quantity of coal;...

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - the amount of service tax collected wrongly but not deposited with the government - due to the service being not taxable at the relevant...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be proved as necessary ingredient for imposition of penalty under sub-section (5) of Section 78, on proving...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - there was a confusion at the field level for proper classification of activity undertaken by the appellant as to whether it is under ‘Business...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - even if the appellant subsequently pays the amount on being pointed out by the department, along with interest, imposition of penalty under...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - based on the records, maintained by the appellant, the short payment of Service Tax on the GTA service was detected by the department. -...

Penalty - service tax with interest was deposited before issuance of SCN - the assessee has not committed any illegality in not depositing any penalty amount. Penalty...

The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit...

Interpretation of statute - calculation of amount of pre-deposit u/s 18 of the SARFAESI Act - 50% of which amount the borrower is required to deposit as pre-deposit -...

Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

Penalty u/s 78 - when the assessee maintains specified records, the proviso appended to Section 78 of the Act, mandates that imposition of penalties should be restricted...

Quick Updates: