Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2016 Year 2016 This

The adjudicating authority proposed to change the classification ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

May 26, 2016

The adjudicating authority proposed to change the classification and denying exemption, there should be a clear demand issued u/s 11A. Whereas, in the present case, neither SCN says so, on the contrary, the adjudicating authority after re-classifying the goods and denying exemption, straightaway confirmed the demand u/s 11A - Demand set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Exemption from service tax - providing transportation of agricultural produce - De-novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal -...

  2. Imported flow meters, pressure transmitters, level transmitters, parts and accessories were classified under tariff headings 9032 8990 and 9032 9000 or 9026 of Customs...

  3. Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

  4. Adjudicating Authority under FEMA - The High Court clarified that the Adjudicating Authority is not a persona designata, but a designation empowered by the Act. The...

  5. Change in Classification of goods (different from one proposed in SCN) - The claim of the Revenue that the adjudicating authority can classify the goods in a Customs...

  6. Valuation of excisable goods - Amendment to Section 4 - change from Normal value to Transaction value - The Adjudicating Authorities as well as CESTAT are also guilty of...

  7. Initiation of CIRP - Period of Limitation - Exclusion of certain period - NCLT rejected the application - The Adjudicating Authority has committed error in rejecting the...

  8. While permitting withdrawal of Section 9 Application, Adjudicating Authority did not grant liberty to the Appellant to reapproach the Adjudicating Authority in the event...

  9. Prohibition Benami Property Transactions - change of the Adjudicating Authority - The Court further finds its unable to either countenance or discern an indefeasible...

  10. This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020,...

  11. Violation of principles of natural justice by the Adjudicating Officer/Authority in denying opportunity of hearing to appellant A.P. Parekh, who was not a member of the...

  12. Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to adjudicate upon a closure notice issued prior to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

  13. Personal penalty on the charge of forgery of Textile Committee report - It is found that forgery is a very serious charge which should be proved by clear and cogent...

  14. The assessee-Respondent classified the aluminum circles under CTH 76069110 as raw materials, while the department proposed classification under CTH 7616, and the DRI...

  15. Benefit of exemption - second-hand slurry seal machine for filling up cracks in roads (slurry paver) - import of There is nothing on record to indicate that the proposed...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates