Demand of duty based on statement recorded u/s 14 of the Central ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 25, 2016

Demand of duty based on statement recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - flagrant violation of Section 9D by relying upon statements without admitting them in evidence by following the prescribed procedure contained therein - Matter remanded back - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of duty based on statement recorded u/s 14 of the Central ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 25, 2016

You may also like:

Whether the statement recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is admissible? - if it is subsequently retracted or explanation is furnished then it has to be...

Demand of duty - receipt of inputs or not - demand based on statements of the suppliers of the inputs - cross-examination not allowed - Revenue has no other evidence -...

Clandestine removal - reliance on statement of the workers/ employees - Any statement recorded under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act could be admitted in evidence...

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Valuation - Reliance on the statement made before the customs officers - recording of statement u/s 108 - Certainly a statement recorded under duress or coercion cannot...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

Rebate of duty on exports - Compound duty on Pan Masala Packing - Rule 14 - the stand of the department that no rebate can be allowed under Rule 14 of the Central Excise...

Validity of statement - retraction of statement - the statement recorded u/s. 132(4) cannot be discarded merely because the retractment statements were filed. The...

CESTAT Mumbai addressed a case involving a differential Central Excise duty demand u/s 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant discharged the duty upon...

Short payment of Central Excise Duty - The Appellate Tribunal concluded that central excise duty is leviable only on excisable goods manufactured or produced in India,...

Use of materials seized and the statement furnished by the third parties against the assessee - the opportunity for the rebuttal to the assessee for the seized documents...

Duty Demand u/s 28 raised after 14 years – the show cause notice demanding duty was hopelessly time-barred and consequently the confirmation of duty demand along with...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

Undisclosed income - retraction of the statement - the assessee has been consistent in his statements so recorded even during the post search proceedings when his...

Quick Updates: