Imposition of penalty - non filling of ER-5 and ER-6 returns ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 29, 2016

Imposition of penalty - non filling of ER-5 and ER-6 returns within the period prescribed - contravention is only a procedural violation and subsequently the required return has been filed - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - non filling of ER-5 and ER-6 returns ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 29, 2016

You may also like:

Re-assessment - Time limitation for notices issued - period of limitation enhanced from 5 years to 6 years - Prospective or retrospective amendment - 5 year period...

Assessment after re-organization of Business - amalgamation or demerger or merger - To remove the difficulty of filling of return by successor it has been proposed to...

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

Levy of penalty under Rule 12 (6) of Central Excise Rules - late filing of Returns (ER-1) for the period July, 2017 to February, 2018 - There is no saving Clause in the...

Best judgement assessment - GSTR returns were not filed by the petitioner within the prescribed time limit - At any cost, the right to file the returns cannot be taken...

Imposition of penalty - non-filing of Annual Return containing details of inputs for the period 2004-05 - other than the non-filing of return, no other allegation has...

Scope of section 80A(5) - Revised return was not permissible and revised return of revised return is not thought of by the legislature. Thus, u/s 139(5) once return is...

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

New claim of capital losses in the revised return - Return filed within the due date prescribed u/s 139(5) but subsequent to the due date prescribed u/s 139(1) -...

CENVAT Credit - common input services for trading goods - Rule 6(5) starts of non-obstante clause ‘notwithstanding’, which would indicate that the provisions of Rule...

Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) - Suspension of their CCSP approval and imposing a penalty - Demand of value of pilfered goods - custodian of Speedy CFS -...

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

Quick Updates: