Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to ...

Case Laws Customs

February 9, 2017

Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to specify the name of the firm or individual on whom the penalty u/s 114A of CA, 1962 was fastened - There is no requirement for a specific mention of the importer to validate the penalty under section 114A of Customs Act, 1962. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to ...

Case Laws Customs

February 9, 2017

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to specify the name of the firm or individual on whom the penalty u/s 114A of CA, 1962 was fastened - There...

Professional misconduct by CA - Liability of the Engagement partner with audit firm - Acceptance of the Audit Engagement - The NFRA concluded that the audit firm and the...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Imposition of penalty u/s 114A and 112(a) of Customs Act - Liability of penalty on on the authorized signatory or on the proprietor of the firm - penalty under this...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Status of assessee as "AOP" instead of "partnership firm" - The assessee firm was comprised of four individual partners who were representing their respective firms -...

CE - imposition of penalties one on the proprietorship firm and second on the proprietor would amount to imposition of penalty twice, which cannot be sustained in the eyes of law

Dishonor of Cheque - The actual offence should have been committed by the Company then alone the other categories of persons would become liable for the offences - in...

Exemption u/s 10(26) - Exemption to individual members of Scheduled Tribes - Whether a partnership firm, formed by individual partners who are entitled to an exemption...

Insolvency proceedings against the Personal Guarantors - Vires and validity of a notification dated 15.11.2019 issued by the Central Government - It is clear that...

Appellant produced wrong 'Country-of-Origin' certificate to claim notification benefit, amounting to mis-declaration and suppression of facts. Duty along with interest...

Penalty U/s 271B - Failure to get accounts audited - Penalty confirmed - AT

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Dishonor of Cheque - A proprietorship firm is neither a Company, nor a partnership firm. It is merely a business name. Although even a partnership firm is not a juristic...

Quick Updates: