Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2017 Year 2017 This

Penalty u/s 78 - Without the raising of the demand u/s 73(1) ...

Case Laws     Service Tax

February 24, 2017

Penalty u/s 78 - Without the raising of the demand u/s 73(1) ibid and its determination by the adjudicating authority, the penalty u/s 78 of the Act is not sustainable. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

  2. Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

  3. Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

  4. Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

  5. Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire Service Tax and interest paid before issuance of SCN - the appellant have not complied with the provision of section 73(3) and...

  6. Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax with penalty - The provisions of section 73(4) of the Finance Act are not applicable because intention of the...

  7. Service tax demand and interest were raised on the amount towards provident fund. Penalties u/ss 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed. The extended...

  8. Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

  9. Levy of penalty - period of limitation for raising demand - the Tribunal has to first judge as to whether the case of the assessee is covered by proviso below...

  10. Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - Liability imposed without any adjudication proceeding u/s 73 or 74 - despite disputing the liability towards...

  11. Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

  12. The question of penalty proceedings would arise only when there could be valid recovery proceedings under Section 73(1) of the Act. That is the reason when the ‘non...

  13. If the LAA finds that demand is time-barred, he should only set aside the demand on that ground but cannot advise assessee concerned to discharge the disputed amount...

  14. Demand of differential service tax - From the SCN it is evident that all facts and figures were in the appellant’s records but they were belatedly scrutinized by...

  15. Penalty u/s 78 of FA - waiver of penalty - The appellants contention that section 73(3) is applicable in their case is not correct - Once, the ingredients of section...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates