Even though the demand was confirmed for the extended period ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 12, 2017

Even though the demand was confirmed for the extended period which was accepted by the appellant that alone is not the reason for imposing penalty u/s 11AC. Penalty u/s 11AC can only be imposed when it is established that there is suppression of facts on the part of the appellant - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Even though the demand was confirmed for the extended period ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 12, 2017

You may also like:

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - damage of raw material - demand invoking extended period of limitation confirmed - HC

Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

100% EOU - extended period of limitation - while demanding duty was not sure of the provision of law under which the same had to be demanded and even the penalty has...

Invocation of extended period of limitation - activity of direct selling agent on commission basis - The non-payment of service tax was purely a bona fide unawarenss...

Classification - Post construction completion and finishing services - Interior Decorator Service or Commercial or Industrial Construction Service - Extended period of...

Extended period of limitation - Even if extended period is held to be inapplicable then also the entire demand of Service tax will not be completely time barred - AT

Extended period of limitation – Revenue neutrality - Demand set aside - AT

ST - Revenue neutral exercise - demand can not be raising invoking extended period of limitation.

Interest on differential duty by invoking extended period of limitation - Invoking the extending period of limitation is not sustainable and the demand of interest by...

Demand of service tax - Extended period of limitation - In place of invoking extended period in cases of suppression of fact with an intent to evade payment of duty or...

Extended period of limitation - if Cenvat Credit has been allowed in respect of the same services to the other assessee’s there is no justifiable reason for denying the...

Validity of second SCN - invocation of Extended period of Limitation - it is found that the amount of interest under Section 28 AA demanded in the earlier show cause...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

Quick Updates: