Jurisdiction assumed by the ITO - There was no valid objection ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 3, 2017

Jurisdiction assumed by the ITO - There was no valid objection filed by the assessee before the Assessing Officer and in the absence of the same, the assessee cannot now challenge the jurisdiction in appellate proceedings

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction assumed by the ITO - There was no valid objection ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 3, 2017

You may also like:

Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer u/s 120 - Transfer of case u/s 124 - Assessee had a legitimate expectation from the DCIT, Circle-3, Gurgaon, that the objection raised...

Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction - objections were raised by the assessee u/s 124(3) of the Act, within one month of receipt of notice u/s 148 of the Act...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non-issue of a notice u/s 143(2) - The Circular reinforces the position that it is sine qua non for the Assessing Officer to assume...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Rejection of objections of the assessee - The stance of the Assessing Officer leads this Court to prima facie believe that the...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

The assessment order passed u/s 144C(3) was beyond the prescribed period of one month from the end of the month in which the period for filing objections u/s 144C(2)...

Jurisdiction issue regarding the refund claim filed by the service receiver, whether the Mumbai Service Tax authority or the Kolkata Service Tax authority has the...

The High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was not valid where the Assessing Officer had previously examined the claim for deduction of foreign exchange...

Quick Updates: