Revision u/s 263 - unexplained investments - non-initiation of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 12, 2017

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained investments - non-initiation of penalty u/s u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act render the order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue and upheld the revision u/s 263

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained investments - non-initiation of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 12, 2017

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - mistake of non-initiation or incorrect initiation of penalty - the inherent indication u/s 271(1) makes it clear that the Pr. CIT / CIT does...

The assessment order passed u/s 153C was erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC instead of...

Revision u/s 263 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) dropped - voluntarily offer certain income in the form of cash deposits/FDRs - a perusal of the ‘order sheet’ noting of the A.O...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Revision u/s 263 - if the enquiry of such unexplained investment is not done then same would be erroneous order prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue u/s 263 - thus...

Revision u/s 263 - AO did not initiate penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1) (c) - No hesitation in holding that the CIT is not correct in assuming jurisdiction u/s 263 of the...

Revision u/s 263 - dropping of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - neither the assessment order nor the show cause notice in this case did specify the charges leveled, whether it is...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - There is no concrete positive evidence against the assessee exhibiting unexplained investment, except unregistered sale deed, which...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied pursuant to order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 263 was challenged before ITAT, Jaipur Bench. ITAT quashed the order of Principal...

Revision u/s 263 based on DVO's report received after assessment culmination was invalid as per section 142A(4), DVO failed to provide opportunity of being heard to...

Quick Updates: