Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - the transaction between son and ...

January 17, 2018

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - the transaction between son and father and wife and husband, for giving a support and help, in law, is not a loan or deposit in stricter sense of section 269SS of the Act and it is only a financial support - no penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty made u/s 271D - loan transaction between husband and wife - while levying the penalty u/s. 271D AO did not appreciate the fact that the provisions of section...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s 271D - transaction between husband and wife - transaction of loan between husband and wife does not attract the provisions of section 269SS - Penalty...

  3. Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using the money of his son - the money has been given by the son to the father and that have been used by the...

  4. The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

  5. Penalty u/s 271D - accepting cash loan of Rs. 2 lakh in aggregate without any reasonable cause in contravention to section 269SS - transactions between father and son,...

  6. Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

  7. Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

  8. Levy of penalty u/s.271D - assessee had taken cash loan from her husband and mother-in-law which has been repaid in cash - the expression “reasonable cause” in section...

  9. Benami transaction - burden of proof - principle of preponderance of probability that although the suit property was purchased in name of Wife but the consideration...

  10. Penalty u/s 271E of the Act – Repayment of loan made in cash – the confirmation letter from the father cannot be completely brushed aside, especially when the...

  11. Penalty order passed u/s 271E - reasonable cause - cash loan from her husband and mother-in-law which has been repaid in cash - the expression “reasonable cause” in...

  12. Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

  13. Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

  14. Levy of penalty u/s.271D/271E - transaction by passing a journal entry - proof of reasonable cause u/s 273B - the business constraint and exigency and administrative...

  15. The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates