Conduct of the Income Tax officials - First raising ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 19, 2018

Conduct of the Income Tax officials - First raising unsustainable, illegal and high pitched demands and then seeking to coercively recover the same even showing scant regard to the orders passed by highest Tribunal under the Act and for that invoking the writ jurisdiction to seek support to their such effort is nothing but an utterly irresponsible and unfair behaviour. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Conduct of the Income Tax officials - First raising ...

Case Laws Income Tax

January 19, 2018

You may also like:

Short/non-payment of service tax - Jurisdiction to raise the Demand - The Tribunal notes that during the period in question, the Appellant was registered in Mumbai and...

Seeking service tax refund for payment of VAT liability - he petitioner had made the payment of the service tax for the periods in question voluntarily and had never...

Initiation of CIRP - pre-existence of dispute - There was no dispute existing prior to the first demand notice and only disputes raised prior to the first demand notice...

Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

Validity of SCN - SCN suffers from incurable deficiency - Demand raised solely on the basis of Income Tax data shared by the Income Tax authorities - CESTAT found that...

Demand of service tax - Demand confirmed under Business Support Services whereas demand was raised under BAS - The first appellate authority has undoubtedly travelled...

Stay of demand - payment of 20% of the outstanding demand - ITAT rejecting its application for stay on the recovery of demand during the pendency of appeal - The Delhi...

The High Court quashed and set aside the demand raised u/s 154 for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 appearing on the petitioner's portal and the computation sheet dated...

The present demand stands raised by way of audit conducted for the second time, when no such objection was raised by the first Audit, which was conducted for the prior...

Denial of CENVAT credit for expenses incurred at unregistered branches and the demand raised by revenue authorities. The key points are: The appellant undertakes...

Seizure of goods - Jurisdiction - Ethanol - goods in question were not prohibited goods - The High court found that the seizure of the petitioner's goods was prima facie...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

Key issues regarding invocation of time limitation for raising demand, levy of penalty, exemption from service tax for bundled services related to the game of cricket,...

Quick Updates: