Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2018 Year 2018 This

Validity of order of reassessment - in order to invoke ...

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax

March 29, 2018

Validity of order of reassessment - in order to invoke jurisdiction u/s 22(1) of the VAT Act or to initiate proceedings for reassessment there must be an order of assessment duly passed by the assessing officer and it must be in existence as a condition precedent to invoke Section 22(1) - there is no deeming fiction under the act - reassessment order is invalid - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reassessment of tax - the order of assessment, was not in existence on the date of issuing notice for reassessment under Section 22 (1) of the Act of 2005. Therefore,...

  2. Jurisdiction of Preventive officer to initiate any proceeding including proceeding u/s 110(1) - Show Cause Notice for seized goods - The High Court determined that the...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  4. The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving...

  5. Protection u/s 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - If the action filed by the respondent bank in the nature of ‘proceedings’ and not...

  6. Provisional attachment - jurisdiction to pass the provisional attachment order - A cumulative reading of the provisions of Section 83(1) read with Section 122(1-A) of...

  7. Jurisdiction of ACIT Bhubaneswar consequent to transfer of case - the Department has not been able to explain the legal basis for Opposite Party No.1 i.e. ACIT at...

  8. Notices issued u/ss 84 and 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were valid. The time limitation for revising assessment orders is not an issue if a...

  9. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It cannot be said that assessee has concealed the particular income with the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act or there is not deep...

  10. Jurisdiction - proper officer to issue summons and conduct inquiry - Investigation / Enquiry proceedings initiation by different authorities of state and central GST -...

  11. The ITAT Raipur had jurisdiction over the case of a private salaried employee's reopened assessment. The jurisdiction was transferred u/s 127 to ITO, Ward-1(1), Bhilai...

  12. CHA - once proceedings under Regulation 22 is initiated which is normally done after the completion of investigations in a case, the proceedings under Regulation 21 go...

  13. Service tax recovery from foreign government agencies for statutory fees/licenses - Petitioner's declaration under SVLDRS rejected - HC held pre-deposit amount during...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

  15. Initiation of proceedings u/s 201(1) - period of limitation - It would be interesting to note that on the ground that the two foreign companies had filed applications...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates