Refund claim - destruction of rejected inputs and expired ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 17, 2018

Refund claim - destruction of rejected inputs and expired manufactured goods - rejection of refund on the ground that destruction was not carried out in the presence of Central Excise officer - as such, the benefit, cannot be denied on a mere procedural lapse.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - destruction of rejected inputs and expired ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 17, 2018

You may also like:

Reversal of Input Tax Credit - inputs consumed in dye intermediates (which is also a finished goods), where such goods have been destroyed in fire - - Since the said...

Refund of utilized input tax credit - rejection of claim for refund - When the law requires that no application for refund shall be rejected without giving the applicant...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Rebate / refund claim - input stage credit - inputs used in the manufacture of their export goods - claim was rightly rejected on the grounds that the applicant has...

Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

Refund - Whether reduction in gauge by way of cold rolling process will amount to manufacture or not - held that the activity is manufacturing activity - claim of refund...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - The appellants have claimed the refund in respect of the input service used in relation to export of finished goods, therefore, the refund is...

Refund of the unutilized ITC accumulated on account of inverted tax structure - refund claimed on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

The High Court held that Section 17(2) of the CGST Act is not ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution to the extent it restricts refund under the inverted duty...

CENVAT Credit - inputs - goods which is used even not in the manufacture directly but even if it is used in relation to the manufacture and indirectly, the said goods...

Refund of SAD - The appellant, a trader, imported goods and claimed a refund on the paid Special Additional Duty (SAD). However, the refund claims were rejected by the...

100% EOU - Refund claim - Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 - rejection of refund claims merely on the ground of nexus with the manufacture of the product is not legally tenable - AT

Quick Updates: