Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - expenditure of webhosting and misc. ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 17, 2018

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - expenditure of webhosting and misc. expenditure for website development - when the assessee has come up with bonafide claim, even if it is not accepted, it would not per se tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars so as to attract the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c)

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - expenditure of webhosting and misc. ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 17, 2018

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of capital expenditure of Research and Development - The facts material to the computation were not produced - levy of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - merely for the reason that the said expenditure was claimed as a revenue expenditure would not justify imposition of penalty under Sec....

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - forex loss was claimed as revenue expenditure - inadvertent claim of expenditure would not, ipso facto, amount to concealment of income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revenue expenditure or not - expenses on NPA’s - merely because the assessee has claimed the expenditure, which claim was not accepted or not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if ld. AO has treated the amount as capital expenditure, certainly assessee will be entitled to claim depreciation but the crux is, it is...

Quick Updates: