This Court is surprised and is pained by the manner in which the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

October 4, 2018

This Court is surprised and is pained by the manner in which the authority has passed the impugned reassessment order in the second round of assessement just ignoring the applicable Notification and throwing it to winds. - Deputy commissioner directed to deposit ₹ 50000 as cost.

View Source

← Previous Next →

This Court is surprised and is pained by the manner in which the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

October 4, 2018

You may also like:

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Mandation of obtaining sanction of JCIT - addition made u/s 68 - It is a well settled legal principle that when a statutory...

Validity of order of passed by the Revisional authority - The respondent authorities acting as quasi judiciary authority by invoking the power under statute are expected...

Validity of Survey proceedings u/s 133A conducted in absence of assessee - Manner of conducting survey u/s 133A - There was a time gap of more than 3 ½ years between the...

Stay of demand - the discretion to be exercised u/s 220(6) is to be exercised in a fair and judicious manner and in accordance with the principles laid down by us in...

Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental...

Exemption from turnover - inter-state sale or not - Form-F declaration - false document - consignment sales or not - AO rejected the claim on inter-state movement of...

The subordinate authority is not empowered to supersede the orders passed by the appellate authority and an administrative discipline requires that the subordinate...

Penalty u/s 271AAB - Defects in the notice issued u/s 274 - CIT(A) reduced the penalty to 10% applying provisions of Section 271AAB(a) of the Act as against penalty...

Principles of natural justice - Reply not given for notice served - There are no justification for the peremptoriness of the adjudicating authority in foreclosing grant...

Claim of interest on delayed refund - the petitioner was required to unnecessarily litigate in two rounds; in the first round, up-till the Tribunal and in the second...

The High Court held that the Revisional Authority did not follow the proper procedure prescribed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act while invoking its revisionary powers. The...

CIRP - the debt of the Respondents was declared as Financial Debt - Though the learned Counsel for the Appellants would contend that the Adjudicating Authority lacks...

Cancellation of registration certificate of dealer - disallowance of input tax credit - even in the second round of litigation, the respondent no.2 authority has alleged...

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

Control of income-tax authorities - U/s 118 of IT ACT 1961 - Specifies the income-tax authority or authorities as subordinate to such other income-tax authority or...

Quick Updates: