Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2018 Year 2018 This

Levy of penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - bogus purchase made from hawala ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

October 13, 2018

Levy of penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - bogus purchase made from hawala dealers - mere disallowance of purchases on adhoc basis does not tantamount to willful furnishing inaccurate particulars of income within the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. - No penalty

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

  2. Bogus purchase bills from certain ‘hawala’ dealers - The Tribunal found the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases from alleged Hawala dealers,...

  3. Addition u/s 68 - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - concealment of particulars - unexplained cash credit / bogus purchases - At the time of assessment, the...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

  5. The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases @ 25% on total purchase - After analyzing the order of the A.O. as well as the ld. CIT(A), we also found that both the lower...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of 20% on account of bogus purchases - Monetary limit for filing appeal - The revenue has tried to make out a case that since the...

  8. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  9. The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases - Once the quantitative details of purchases and the corresponding quantitative sales have not been...

  11. Estimation of income - bogus purchases - A.O. has observed that respondent has purchased material from someone else while bogus bills were organized by these Hawala...

  12. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  13. Levy of penalty on dealers who issues Bogus Invoices - Cenvat Credit - Bogus credit - levy of penalty confirmed, though reduced - AT

  14. Mere disallowance of expenses u/s 40A(3) would not invite penalty for concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Assessee disclosed all particulars...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates